I think that's what RacherOS does as well, which is interesting as they're claiming it's production ready! Only Docker seems neat, I'm loving all of these experiments.
I'm not quite up to speed here, but aren't these simple linux user lands, running on a normal Kernel, and not actually real OSes that provide a new set of APIs to interact with the system?
I see all these "DockerOS", "RancherOS", "CoreOS" things and at the end it is just a kernel and a set of programs that take over the init process in a certain way.
Careful or you may fall into the 'What is an OS' discussion. :)
They are all kernels and suites of tools, namely Docker and usually Busybox. The primary objective in all cases is to have a minimal OS host for Docker containers so they can drop the normal suite of tools.
> Seems like they're trying to puff themselves up again; wonder what stupid thing they are up to now.
There are two rules about HN comments: be civil, and be substantive. This comment is uncivil and unsubstantive.
All: when you see a comment that violates the HN guidelines this badly, please flag it by clicking on its timestamp ("x hours ago") to go to its page, then clicking "flag".
1) That was a simple question; it was a leading question asking the direction Docker is taking now. That maybe disrespectful to a few people in Docker; but I think it's a good question as a user who uses docker.
2) Your negative comment was unwarranted and unnecessary.
I will flag your comment but I am sure people will view me as the antagonist instead of someone who was attacked for no reason.
I'm happy to see the variety of operating systems coming out lately.