The counter-complimenting (but not contradictory) point is that it's also true that you could create a business, especially a purely software-based business in terms of how it scales, and it could hit only say $1M or even $200k in revenue or profit each year, and that would be a huge success -- as long as you kept the team small, the ownership in your hands, etc., ideally as close to 1-2 people as possible even. Getting say $200k/year of mostly passive income would be a huge life-changing state of affairs. We don't all need to become GitHub or Pinterest or Facebook, etc. In business, a homerun is relative. FU money for a single founder with 100% ownership is pretty small in the grand scheme of things.