Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The reason to commit so ferociously to Vietnam was to show our other strategic partners and allies how far USA was willing to go for seemingly small things; if we’ll dump endless troves of blood and treasure for a small country in Asia, what will we do if tanks push into Berlin?


Thats a benefit to the military response, but I dont believe the massive waste of political capital, manpower, and supplies looked impressive to other countries. Especially after the abrupt exit. The use of cruise missiles has been far more imoressive.


> I dont believe the massive waste of political capital, manpower, and supplies looked impressive to other countries

“If they would waste all that blood and treasure for a small country in east Asia, imagine what they would do if tanks rolled into Moscow?!”


What was more impressive was the results of the US's cultural economic and soft power efforts.

The cultural part can't be understated. By the 1960's young men world wide would rather be a rock star banging groupies than fight for the revolution. There is a reason the Khmer Rouge killed the pop stars in Cambodia.

Notable Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Germany became wealthy by aligning closely to the US. Where commies and non aligned became poorer.

Least impressive was the CIA's skullduggery and Kissinger's Real Politic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: