This might have to do with scale. At my employer (~7k employees) we started down this path a few years ago as well, and while it has taken longer for remote to be better than local, it now definitively is and has unlocked all kinds of other stuff that wasn't possible with the local-only version. One example is working across multiple branches by switching machines instead of files on local has meant way lower latency when switching between tasks.
One thing I've never understood (and admittedly have not thoroughly researched) is how a remote workspace jives with front-end development. My local tooling is all terminal-based, but after ssh'ing into the remote box to conduct some "local" development, how do I see those changes in a browser? Is the local just exposed on an ip:port?
Facebook's web repo which includes all the PHP and JS for facebook.com and a bunch of other sites is one big massive repo. For development you claim out a server that has a recent checkout of the codebase. Right after claiming it it syncs in your personal commits/stacks you're working on, ready to rebase. You access that machine on a subdomain of any of the FB websites. As far as I remember it was something along the lines of 12345.od.facebook.com, but the format changed from time to time as infra changed. Client certificate authentication and VPN needed (that may no longer be the case, my info is 1y+ old).
There was an internal search provider (bunnylol) that had tools like putting @od in front of any FB URL to generate a redirect of that URL to your currently checked out On Demand server. Painless to work with! Nice side benefit of living on the same domain as the main sites is that the cookies are reused, so no need to log in again.
Have you tried vs code remote development plugin? It can do port forwarding (e.g. forwarding port 8080 on your local machine to port 8080 on the remote machine).
Are you using a public cloud to host the dev boxen? Is compilation actually faster than locally – assuming that your pc's having been replaced to lower-specced versions since they don't do any heavy lifting anymore?
I work for a not-really-tech company (and I'm not a full-time dev either), so I've been issued a crappy "ultra-portable" laptop with an ultra-low-voltage CPU. I've looked into offloading my dev work to an AWS instance, but was quite surprised that it wasn't any faster than doing things locally for things like Rust compiles.
In our case it is mostly faster when provisioning a machine with significantly more cores. In cloud machines you get “vcores” which are not the same as a core on a local cpu.
I’ve been integrating psrecord into our builds to track core utilisation during the built and see that a lot of time is spent in single threaded activities. Effort is required to compile modules in parallel but that is actually quite straightforward. Running all tests in parallel is harder.
We get the most out of the cloud machines by being able to provision a 16+ core machine to run more complicated (resilience) tests and benchmarks.
Also note that typically the cloud machines run on lower clocked CPUs than you would find in a workstation depending on which machine you provision.
Haha, as I read more words of your comment, I got more sure that we worked at the same place. Totally agree, remote devboxes are really great these days!
However, I also feel like our setup was well suited to remote-first dev anyway (eg. syncing of auto-generated files being a pain for local dev).
