Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you add code to Github and host it on Vercel, isn't ownership still yours?


Seeing that Github is exploiting FOSS for its own commercial interests and possibly violating licenses (Copilot), it's not exactly the kind of ownership that I envision when somebody says "own your data".

Don't know much about Vercel, but I'd be skeptical.

I think it'd be an improvement over this project to make those dependencies optional. For example, if I wanted to self-host. I'm using NetlifyCMS for a project and I agree with others that the whole space could use a bit of innovation.


In my opinion, code I add to Github is still mine. Guess we'll have to agree to disagree here.

Self-hosting would be awesome indeed, but I think doing it would be quite complicated because of the authentication part, which is needed to push changes to a git provider.


I don't know how much you want to get into this, but since we're already on this topic:

https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/external-oauth-clients/ https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/oauth2-provider/

NetlifyCMS allows you to define your own backends, and Gitea now has OAuth2 support. Should be able to adopt a similar strategy and allow Gitea to be used as a backend.


Thanks for the references. I'm definitely interested in adding more options to Outstatic. Haven't heard of Gitea before. It looks cool :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: