Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> All the social model aims to do is think about a separation of the impairment itself and the ways in which society may make it worse.

The aim is merely a change in thinking? I'm pretty sure one aim is to get more resources to support disabled (or impaired) people. And that's fine. We live in a society.

What's not fine is the rhetorical trickery (motivated redefinitions of words) deployed as part of the SM.



It's a bleak, paranoid take to feel that people are attempting "trickery" when raising issues like these.

It is not a redefinition of the word "disabled" -- it is a reexamination of what actually leads to a person being "disabled."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: