> All the social model aims to do is think about a separation of the impairment itself and the ways in which society may make it worse.
The aim is merely a change in thinking? I'm pretty sure one aim is to get more resources to support disabled (or impaired) people. And that's fine. We live in a society.
What's not fine is the rhetorical trickery (motivated redefinitions of words) deployed as part of the SM.
The aim is merely a change in thinking? I'm pretty sure one aim is to get more resources to support disabled (or impaired) people. And that's fine. We live in a society.
What's not fine is the rhetorical trickery (motivated redefinitions of words) deployed as part of the SM.