This is maybe the dumbest thing I've ever seen on the front page here. I love how it has a factual title, giving some concrete numbers, then goes on to give no specific derivation for those numbers at all.
And then there are sentences that don't even make sense like "In the US investors lost millions of dollars and when the “big guys” that share prices reached completely unrealistic levels far from what economists call fundamentals."
And then there are sentences that don't even make sense like "In the US investors lost millions of dollars and when the “big guys” that share prices reached completely unrealistic levels far from what economists call fundamentals."
How did this turd get 10 points here?