Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ursuscamp's commentslogin

The readme says it's 88,000 lines of "hand-written" C, and yet there's only 41 commits all from the last day, and they're all co-authored by Claude.

I have no problem with AI code, but it should not be advertised as hand-written.


I think Claude wrote that part, referring to itself having hand-written them. (It seems to like that phrase a lot.)

Machine generated lying.

“Machine-generated lying”, or “the machine generated those lies”.

I saw these referenced in the repo. Maybe the hand written parts are here?

https://github.com/nordstjernen-web/lexbor

https://github.com/nordstjernen-web/quickjs


No, as those are just forks of already existing projects and the forks don't contain any additional commits compared to upstream.

All of those are within range of Iranian missiles and drones. The only ways out of this are total war or final settlement giving Iranian favorable terms.


The US, China, Russia, India etc can bolster UAE defense in Fujairah. It's UAE and Omani controlled waters around there, the same area that the US is enforcing its current blockade.


That scraggly tag team of allies, the US, China, Russia, and India.

I can only see two natural allies here (US and India) and clear reasons why Russia and China benefit from the current order, or at least are harmed less than the US.


I don't mean they'll literally ally, I meant any one of them could guarantee the UAE.

Also multiple partners don't need to ally to necessarily guarantee the UAE. UAE has been growing closer to China recently and now that UAE has left OPEC+ they could make deals with China for protection for favored oil contracts. The US could do the same.


Iran is also playing a PR war lately, playing the victims of the big bad USA.

They IMO embarrassed themselves hugely by shooting missiles and drones at their neighbors; not sure they'll want to also try to sink (literally) a new way for the world to get oil from that peninsula but through other routes.

Though of course propaganda knows no rest. They'll likely bend over backwards and do a front flip to again make it the fault of everyone else but not them.


Truly amazing times. Just doing things has never been easier, and it has really reinvigorated me.


Maybe Ghostty will follow Zig to Codeberg, but it doesn't seem like a fit to me.


OSS is increasingly bisecting into two camps, and you can tell which camp they are in depending on whether their developers use X or Mastodon/Bluesky.


It's 100% oriented around the US political compass, too.

I noticed this in ~2012 in the Python community. PyCon 2013 was the last "real PyCon" in my eyes. That was "Donglegate" happened, and was the last TiP BoF.

Since then it's only increased both in both scale and scope.

The politics of each "side" completely aside, it has worried me for a long time that the division has infected F/OSS as well, and weakened it as a result.


It's best to ignore such things.


How much degradation are you wiling to observe before you conclude maybe it should not be ignored?


Caring about whether a user is on team 'x' or team 'bluesky' is the degradation.


My brain is so cooked that I saw “M 7.4” and the first thing I thought was, “Which model is that?”


It's quite mid on the benchmarks. No where near the SOTA earthquakes.


They are heavily invested in Bitcoin and still offer and improve their Bitcoin services. It’s not really “blockchain.” They’re not a crypto company. They are ideologically dedicated to Bitcoin.


MiniMax has an incredibly affordable coding plan for $10/month. It has a rolling five hour limit of 100 prompts. 100 prompts doesn't sound like much, but in typical AI company accounting fashion, 1 prompt is not really 1 prompt. I have yet to come even close to hitting the limit with heavy use.


They abandoned Swift recently.


The public announcement was less then a week ago. Meanwhile in TFA:

> ... the entire port took about two weeks.

So he was ~halfway in when he made the Swift announcement.


Doesn’t sound like a bad thing to evaluate the most obvious alternative to build confidence before officially pulling the plug.


The most obvious alternative would be Zig. I don't see any Swift adoption outside the Apple ecosystem.


The key requirement is memory safety, which would rule out Zig.


Last time I checked, Zig was breaking it's stdlib, so it's not an alternative imo


Swift adoption had been dead long before the actual announcement. It's likely Rust was being considered long before this two week experiment with LLMs.


This is depressing because we will go to war over this and it’s going to be five years before people realizing they were tricked by “babies in incubators” propaganda.


No. Shut up. This has been confirmed by countless Iranians



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: